Sunday, December 30, 2007
Tuesday, December 18, 2007
Monday, December 17, 2007
Friday, December 7, 2007
Sunday, December 2, 2007
Saturday, December 1, 2007
and you can even do some christmas shopping while you're there.
Friday, November 30, 2007
when did katie holmes...
...become bai ling?
or is she just preparing for that age-old, vomitously cute mommy/toddler christmas (sorry - *holiday*) lookalike photo?
our lesson on severe bangs: do not try at home.
our lesson on mommy-and-me lookalike photo shoots: barf.
our lesson on bai ling: ummmmm..... who is she again? other than muse to the fug girls? no clue on this one, sorry.
Thursday, November 29, 2007
Sunday, November 25, 2007
...looked strikingly similar to the fug-o-rific masterpiece wilhelmena forced upon posh spice for the ebony & ivory wedding of the year?
and do you think i need to stop watching so much tv??
Friday, November 23, 2007
Thursday, November 22, 2007
we had a brief falling-out a few years ago when they put britney on the cover, but we had made up until jane booted jane.
and brought in brandon?
i'm so confused. where did jane go?
oh - the talk show circuit. to discuss a lesbian romp with drew barrymore in the early 90's?
the writers are still there, they're still witty and irreverent, and i still run upstairs and immediately plop down on the couch to read the magazine cover-to-cover (back to front -- don't ask why) every time it arrives.
until *poof*, it's gone.
and in its place, glamour?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!
that's what the site says. that's what the blogs say. they're going to send me glamour. i like jane because it's the ANTI-cosmo, and now you're going to send me a second-rate, cosmo-wannabe?? why can't you send me something i actually like? W, perhaps? or vogue? i am sad, and fairchild publications needs to atone for my loss. they even usurped jane's site: janemag.com. *sigh*
so the next month, i open my stuffed mailbox and pout, missing jane and expecting to pull out my new glamour. blah. but i'll read it because i'm a magazine whore with a limited attention span. and, sadly, i may even like it.
instead, i pulled out redbook?!?!??!?!?!?!!!!!
wtf, fairchild? "for the woman juggling family, career, and her own needs"?!?!?!?!?!?
to top it off, the november issue has a huge toys-r-us insert in the middle. I DO NOT HAVE KIDS, PEOPLE!!!!!!! nor do i WANT them! nor do i want to READ about them!!!!!
(that's why i have nieces and nephews. know what kind of candy they like and give them back to their parents when they become a pain in the arse. done.)
although this last one did have ashley judd on the cover, and she is pretty awesome.... she would've been in jane.
a) he did have a whopping 2-day head start on me
b) it could be worse:
so nice of her to help me with that.
Thursday, November 15, 2007
i have always been fascinated by how environmental vs. biological factors affect people's actions, decisions, or anything else that can be logically analyzed. i am very black-and-white, but i like to explore the grey areas. like, why are all oldest children bossy, youngest children super-outgoing, and middle children just basically screwed up? (you know where you are there.) or why do i like kit kats, karats, and, uh... well, i can't think of anything else that starts with a "k." but i do know i got a lot of strikeouts when i played softball growing up. just read the damn article:
Wednesday, November 14, 2007
i fully expect to see tech's band ripping this off at homecoming next year. i will be highly disappointed if not. they'll just have to lock up the flag girls cuz i just don't see them fitting in... except maybe one at the end, dressed as a princess.
turns out i already did..... :)
so i'm going to start posting things that amuse me, in hopes that someone else will be amused as well. or i may post things that annoy me, but i'd rather not turn this into "things that piss kelley off" because that would be a looooong, not-exactly-uplifting list. however, you have been warned! i'll just call them my own "new rules."
just what the world needs: another blog.